Cases 21 - 30 of 30
BROWN v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2014cv04571
Respondent:
NANCY A. GIROUX, JOHN E. WETZEL, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY and others
Petitioner:
DAVID BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Brown v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 13-15287
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF FLORIDA, Honorable Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General
Brown v. Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2013cv22499
Plaintiff:
David Brown
Defendant:
Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2013cv00148
Petitioner:
DAVID BROWN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Brown v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 12-16437
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Brown v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv21909
Plaintiff:
David Brown
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2012cv20887
Plaintiff:
David Brown
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 9:2009cv00185
Petitioner:
Charles David Brown
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Ercole
as 1:2007cv04513
Petitioner:
David Brown
Respondent:
Robert Ercole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2007cv03465
Petitioner:
EMILIO DAVID BROWN
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
