Cases 21 - 30 of 1,757
Vaughan v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00244
Petitioner:
Donald Vaughan
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Cooper v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6294
Petitioner:
KENNETH DWIGHT COOPER
Respondent:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Donald Vaughan v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6290
Petitioner:
DONALD DOC VAUGHAN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Swiger v. State of West Virginia
as 3:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Aaron L. Swiger
Respondent:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Deandre Johnson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6272
Petitioner:
DEANDRE JOHNSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Hernandez-Navarro v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez-Navarro
Respondent:
Virginia Commonwealth of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yeverton v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Rashauwn X. Yeverton
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Navarro v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez-Navarro
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Gregory v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6168
Petitioner:
KEVIN LEE GREGORY
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and ROY CHEATAM, Warden
Barbour v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Jonathan O. Barbour
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
