Cases 31 - 40 of 3,579
Aigbekaen (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Respondent:
John F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bickle (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00425
Petitioner:
Nicholas Bickle
Respondent:
J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jennifer Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical, et al
as 24-5113
Petitioner:
JENNIFER WIDENER LARSEN
Respondent:
WELLNESS PATH MEDICAL, SHERIFF STEVE REAMS, WCSO and SHERIFF F/N/U HEYER, LCSO
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00265
Petitioner:
Robert F Caldwell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoffman v. Garza
as 4:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Tariq Hoffman
Respondent:
F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mason v. James Allred
as 7:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Preston Smith, Bill Clements, FNU Clemens and others
Respondent:
James Allred and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Garza
as 1:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Sye Newton
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Molinares-Nunez v. Garrido
as 4:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Carlos Molinares-Nunez
Respondent:
F.J. Garrido and F J Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lemberger, Gary v. Suter, Christine
as 3:2023cv00886
Petitioner:
Gary F. Lemberger
Respondent:
Christine Suter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nash v. F C I - Talladega
as 5:2023cv01806
Plaintiff:
Paul Nash, Jr
Defendant:
Warden F C I - Talladega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
