Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2010cv01877
Petitioner:
James Davis, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv01365
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Dwight Neven
Petitioner:
James Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Duane Weir v. Ben Curry, et al
as 10-15731
Petitioner - Appellee:
DUANE ROY WEIR
Respondent - Appellant:
BEN CURRY, Warden
Respondent:
JAMES DAVIS, Chairman of Board of Parole Hearing
Davis v. Shartel et al
as 4:2010cv00177
Petitioner:
James Davis
Respondent:
Terry Shartel, Ms. Hulett, Mr. Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Staffiero v. Clark et al
as 2:2009cv01717
Petitioner:
Paul Staffiero
Respondent:
Ken Clark and James Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Staffiero v. Clark et al
as 1:2009cv01188
Petitioner:
Paul Staffiero
Respondent:
Ken Clark and James Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence Remsen v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 09-15756
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE REMSEN
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JAMES E. TILTON, JAMES DAVIS and others
Davis v. Davis
as 1:2009cv10748
Petitioner:
James Davis
Respondent:
Barry D Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Genniro v. J. Salazar, et al
as 08-56973
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY GENNIRO
Respondent - Appellee:
J. F. SALAZAR
Respondent:
JAMES DAVIS, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and JAMES E. TILTON
DAVIS v. POWER
as 1:2008cv04704
Petitioner:
JAMES DAVIS
Respondent:
MIKE POWER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
