General Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 392
Anthony M. Rivera v. Neil McDowell
as 8:2022cv01162
Petitioner: Anthony M. Rivera
Respondent: Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sandlain v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00304
Petitioner: Blake Sandlain
Respondent: FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ladedrick Lequan McGlory v. Neill McDowell et al
as 5:2022cv00850
Petitioner: Ladedrick Lequan McGlory
Respondent: Neill McDowell and Attorney General Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sandlain v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00276
Petitioner: Blake Sandlain
Respondent: FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sandlain v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00222
Petitioner: Blake Sandlain
Respondent: FCI McDowell Warden Rokosky and Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Clifford Jackson v. Neil McDowell
as 22-55607
Petitioner / Appellant: CLIFFORD D. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee: NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Hill v. FCI McDowell Warden
as 1:2022cv00180
Petitioner: John Farelin Hill
Respondent: FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Joe Danny Rodriguez v. Neil McDowell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00697
Petitioner: Joe Danny Rodriguez
Respondent: Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Anthony Chatman v. Neil McDowell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00559
Petitioner: Raymond Anthony Chatman
Respondent: Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Bishop v. Neil McDowell
as 22-55324
Petitioner / Appellant: RONALD STEVEN BISHOP
Respondent / Appellee: NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Warden, Ironwood State Prison

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?