Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2010cv00130
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
N. Quarterman, L Johnson, E Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2010cv00129
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID, Lonnie Johnson, E Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 9:2010cv00041
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
N. Quarterman, L Johnson, E Benoit and others
Defendant:
S Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Noll
as 3:2009cv02341
Petitioner:
Leon S Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
C Noll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lovell Brown v. B. Curry, et al
as 09-16162
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOVELL S. BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
B. CURRY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Steven Brown v. Edwin Voorhies, Jr.
as 09-3200
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN S. BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Warden
Steven Brown v. Edwin Voorhies, Jr.
as 09-3199
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN S. BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Warden
Becker v. Ohio Attorney General et al
as 6:2007cv01417
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Ohio Attorney General, Marc Dann, J. Petro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Curry et al
as 2:2007cv01474
Petitioner:
Lovell S. Brown
Respondent:
B Curry and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 2:2007cv00014
Petitioner:
Steven S. Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
