Cases 41 - 50 of 108
Custer v. Marquez-Espino et al
as 2:2019cv01282
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Allery K Marquez-Espino
Petitioner:
Spring May Custer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torres v. Warden - FCI Big Spring
as 5:2019cv00120
Petitioner:
Rudy Gonzales Torres
Respondent:
NFN Warden - FCI Big Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Velasquez v. Warden, FCI Big Spring
as 6:2019cv00041
Petitioner:
Bruno Rudolfo Velasquez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Big Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banda v. Warden, FCI Big Spring
as 6:2019cv00040
Petitioner:
Kino Luna Banda
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Big Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bergeron v. Unknown Agents of Cobb County Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv03250
Petitioner:
Jacob Bergeron
Respondent:
Unknown Operators of Mind Control Devices, Unknown Agents of Canton Georgia, Unknown Agents of Holly Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Warden - FCI Big Spring [Texas]
as 1:2019cv00101
Respondent:
Warden - FCI Big Spring [Texas]
Petitioner:
Jerry Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAMIREZ v. SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS et al
as 5:2019cv01295
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, COM OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
GENESIS MATOS RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GARIDO-GONZALEZ v. WARDEN, BIG SPRINGS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
as 2:2019cv08792
Petitioner:
ROBERTO GARIDO-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, BIG SPRINGS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grimes v. Colorado Springs City Commissioners
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant:
State of Colorado and Colorado Springs City Commissioners
Petitioner:
Jerome L. Grimes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spring v. Brandyshawn
as 4:2018cv02920
Respondent:
Warden Harris Brandyshawn and Warden Brandeshawn Harris
Petitioner:
Jeffrey M. Spring and Jeffrey M. Spring, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
