Cases 51 - 60 of 105
Yusef Sykes v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7098
Petitioner - Appellant:
YUSEF HASSAN SYKES
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections
Harris v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 3:2011cv00325
Petitioner:
Dextram L. Harris
Respondent:
Director, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Denory Bell v. Director Department of Correct
as 11-6574
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENORY A. BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Proctor v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 7:2011cv00202
Respondent:
Director, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Erin Dean Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Gill v. Director Dept Correction
as 11-6479
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND LEON GILL
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, a/k/a Director of Department of Corrections
Rivers v. Director Department Of Corrections
as 7:2011cv00153
Respondent:
Director Department Of Corrections
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Tyree Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallen v. Ortiz, et al
as 10-1574
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN WALLEN
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director, Department of Corrections and JOHN SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Roy Hunt, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7456
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY HUNT, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections
William Halvorsen v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7449
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM K. HALVORSEN
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections
Cynthia Welch v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7272
Petitioner - Appellant:
CYNTHIA LYNN WELCH
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.