Cases 51 - 60 of 93
Khan v. LaValley
as 1:2014cv00215
Petitioner:
Pheod Khan
Respondent:
Thomas LaValley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khan v. Glebe
as 2:2013cv02295
Petitioner:
Anjum Nawaz Khan
Respondent:
Pat Glebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shafaat Khan v. Michael Gordon, et al
as 13-3906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAFAAT KHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL GORDON, Chief Probation Officer Montgomery County Adult & Parole Dept. and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Khan v. Whiddon et al
as 2:2013cv00638
Petitioner:
Safraz Khan
Respondent:
Stuart Whiddon , Marc J. Moore , John Sandweg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hamidullah, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 12-5410
Petitioner - Appellant:
Hamidullah, Detainee and Wakeel Khan, as Next Friend to Hamidullah
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Jack L. Briggs, II, Col., Commander and others
Genghis Stevenson v. Director of CA Dept of Correct
as 12-56530
Petitioner - Appellant:
GENGHIS KHAN ALI STEVENSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Yusafi v. Holder et al
as 4:2012cv00398
Petitioner:
Faran Khan Yusafi
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Janet Napolitano, Kenneth Landgrebe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KHAN v. GORDON et al
as 2:2011cv07465
Petitioner:
SHAFAAT KHAN
Respondent:
MICHAEL GORDON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Khan v. Holder
as 1:2011cv03937
Respondent:
Eric Holder
Petitioner:
Fazil Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shaw Khan v. Barack Obama, et al
as 10-5306
Petitioner - Appellant:
Shaw Ali Khan
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Obama, Robert M. Gates, Tom Copeman, Navy Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
