Cases 61 - 70 of 6,810
Broadnax v. Jackson
as 4:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Christopher Broadnax
Respondent:
Warden Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2024cv00871
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut
Respondent:
D. Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Budden v. Janson
as 9:2024cv00678
Petitioner:
LeAndre Dion Budden
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Warden of Bennettsville FCI
as 5:2024cv00585
Petitioner:
Marshall DeWayne Williams
Respondent:
Warden of Bennettsville FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Victoria v. Palmer
as 5:2024cv00431
Petitioner:
Christopher Lamar Victoria
Respondent:
Warden John Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERNANDEZ ZAPATA v. Williamsburg Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00749
Petitioner:
JUAN J. HERNANDEZ ZAPATA
Respondent:
WILLIAMSBURG CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cottone v. Warden Janson
as 0:2024cv00376
Petitioner:
Michael Cottone
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lotharp v. Joseph
as 4:2024cv00858
Petitioner:
Zannie J. Lotharp and Zannie Jay Lotharp
Respondent:
Warden M. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mayers v. Warden Antonelli
as 0:2024cv01033
Petitioner:
Breon Mayers
Respondent:
Warden Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zamora Miranda v. FCI Bennettsville's Warden, Joseph
as 9:2024cv01278
Petitioner:
Pablo David Zamora Miranda
Respondent:
FCI Bennettsville's Warden, Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
