Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Clifton v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Casey B. Clifton
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dortch v. Jeffreys
as 8:2023cv00262
Petitioner:
Milton B. Dortch, Jr.
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiggins v. Omaha Police Dept.
as 8:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Jerrold B. Wiggins
Respondent:
Omaha Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. Myers
as 8:2020cv00235
Petitioner:
Kevin B. Harris
Respondent:
Michael B. Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dortch v. Wasmer
as 8:2020cv00120
Respondent:
Todd Wasmer
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Milton B. Dortch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tyrrell v. Frakes et al
as 8:2018cv00596
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Nebraska Parole Board and Scott R. Frakes
Petitioner:
Gregory B. Tyrrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mick v. Randall
as 8:2017cv00082
Petitioner:
Steven E. Mick
Respondent:
Gary B. Randall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. Peart
as 8:2014cv00368
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Mario Peart
Petitioner:
Harold B. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Peart et al
as 8:2014cv00152
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Mario Peart and State of Nebraska
Petitioner:
Harold B. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woolman v. Lancaster County Corrections
as 4:2011cv03044
Respondent:
Lancaster County Attroneys Office
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael B. Woolman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
