Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Bowman v. Harmon
as 1:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Hywel Channing Bowman
Respondent:
Stephen Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chan v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv01315
Respondent:
Patrick Lechleitner, Christopher LaRose, Merrick Garland and others
Petitioner:
Hau Cheong Chan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Blackwell v. Scott
as 5:2024hc02126
Respondent:
Matt Scott
Petitioner:
Channing Al-Lamara Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
David Oiler v. David LeMaster
as 24-5033
Petitioner:
DAVID CHANNING OILER
Respondent:
DAVID LEMASTER, Warden
Chan (PS) v. Chai Mai Roon, et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
No Named Respondents, Chan Mai Roon, Htaw Rot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chan (PS) v. Latore, et al
as 1:2023cv02894
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
No Named Respondent, Kelly Latore, Kaire Colwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Oiler v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
David Channing Oiler
Respondent:
Warden LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chan (PS) v. Tatoya et al
as 1:2023cv02314
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
Mo Tatoya, Michael Dugo, Punjwanj and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chan v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv00877
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chan v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv00543
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
