Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hamilton v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01318
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton
Respondent:
Kimberly Smith and Daniel Clark
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Hamilton v. Christine Brannon
as 17-1410
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTINE BRANNON, Warden
HAMILTON v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2016cv05705
Petitioner:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Brannon
as 1:2016cv01310
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton
Respondent:
Christine Brannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00413
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Hamilton, Jr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-50509
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES HAMILTON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Hamilton v. Stephens
as 1:2013cv00645
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Hamilton v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 12-11570
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Hamilton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv00414
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Dir, TDCJ
as 5:2010cv00158
Petitioner:
Lee Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
Dir, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
