General Cases
Hamilton v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01318
Petitioner: Charles Hamilton
Respondent: Kimberly Smith and Daniel Clark
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foust v. Clarke
as 3:2020cv03253
Respondent: Daniel Clarke
Petitioner: David Foust
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glucksmann v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02946
Respondent: Daniel Clarke
Petitioner: Nicolas Glucksmann and Nicholas E. Glucksmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mrazek v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02698
Petitioner: Craig Mrazek
Respondent: Daniel Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mrazek v. Clarke
as 3:2020cv03109
Petitioner: Craig Mrazek
Respondent: Daniel Clarke
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Schnell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2020cv00248
Respondent: Paul Schnell and Shannon Reimann
Petitioner: Nathan Daniel Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sims v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01313
Respondent: Daniel Clark
Petitioner: Johnnie Lee Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv00131
Petitioner: Kerry Daniel Clark
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nathan Clark v. Tom Roy
as 12-2194
Petitioner - Appellant: Nathan Daniel Clark
Respondent - Appellee: Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?