Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Graf v. Fluke et al
as 4:2023cv04173
Petitioner:
Nicholas Daniel Graf
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palomarez v. Sullivan
as 5:2023cv05020
Petitioner:
Alexander Palomarez
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roedder v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2022cv01014
Petitioner:
Richard Keith Roedder
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan and Mark A. Vargo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richmond v. Sullivan
as 5:2022cv05082
Petitioner:
Herbert Lee Richmond
Defendant:
Daniel Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2022cv04111
Petitioner:
Cole Taylor
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Sullivan and Jason Ravensborg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Mattson et al
as 4:2022cv04076
Petitioner:
Daniel Jose Gomez
Respondent:
Michael Mattson and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Quevedo v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022cv05021
Petitioner:
Carlos C. Quevedo
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bausch v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2022cv04026
Petitioner:
Joshua Allen Bausch
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Mattson et al
as 4:2021cv04177
Petitioner:
Daniel Jose Gomez
Respondent:
Michael Mattson, Jerry Miller and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mann v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv04158
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Mann
Respondent:
Doug Clark and Attorney General of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
