Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Ball v. Schriro et al
as 4:2009cv00353
Petitioner:
Earl Ball
Respondent:
Dora B. Schriro and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lemke v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv01059
Petitioner:
Robert D Lemke
Respondent:
Dora B Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wassenaar v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv00854
Petitioner:
Ricky Kurt Wassenaar
Respondent:
Dora B Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Hines v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv00661
Petitioner:
James Lynn O'Hines
Respondent:
Dora B. Schriro, James Gomez, Arizona Attorney General, State of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baker v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv00333
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Baker
Respondent:
Dora B. Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rushing v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv00232
Petitioner:
Gregory Rushing
Respondent:
Dora B. Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Proctor v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv00168
Petitioner:
Jerime Antwon Proctor
Respondent:
Dora B. Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vijan v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv00121
Petitioner:
Masum Vijan
Respondent:
Dora B Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Schriro et al
as 3:2009cv08006
Petitioner:
Eric Michael Clark
Respondent:
Dora B. Schriro, James Arnold and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leonard v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv02388
Petitioner:
Anthony M. Leonard
Respondent:
Dora B. Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
