Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Amado Cancino v. Federal Correctional Center Lompoc
as 2:2023cv02590
Petitioner:
Amado Estevez Cancino
Respondent:
Federal Correctional Center Lompoc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DAY v. WATSON et al
as 1:2020cv02005
Respondent:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL CENTER TERRE HAUTE and T.J. WATSON
Petitioner:
ROGER CHARLES DAY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mauriel Glover v. USA, et al
as 15-60625
Petitioner - Appellant:
MAURIEL GLOVER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN MOSLEY, Federal Correctional Center, Yazoo City Medium
Gregory Liningham v. Mosley
as 15-60451
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY A. LININGHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN MOSLEY, Federal Correctional Center - Yazoo City Medium
Taylor v. Fox et al
as 5:2014cv01190
Petitioner:
Arthur Earl Taylor
Respondent:
FNU Fox and Federal Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boykins v. Warden, Federal Correctional Center Petersburg
as 1:2014cv00627
Petitioner:
Leo Boykins, III
Respondent:
Warden, Federal Correctional Center Petersburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCarthy v. Federal Correctional Center Oakdale et al
as 2:2011cv01538
Plaintiff:
John J McCarthy
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Center Oakdale and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chase v. Federal Correctional Center Oakdale
as 2:2011cv01235
Plaintiff:
Jihad Chase
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Center Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Acevedo v. Bureau of Fort Dix Federeal Correctional Center
as 1:2010cv08204
Petitioner:
Rauline Parades Acevedo
Respondent:
Bureau of Fort Dix Federeal Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Micah Rudisill v. Bruce Pearson
as 10-60573
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICAH RUDISILL
Respondent - Appellee:
BRUCE PEARSON, Warden, Federal Correctional Center Yazoo City
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
