Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Staggers v. Alabama, State of
as 5:2022cv00795
Petitioner:
Gary Staggers
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schreiner v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Gary Schreiner
Respondent:
Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary v. Toney et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
James Edward Gary, Jr.
Defendant:
Deborah Toney and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarez v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Hector Enrique Alvarez
Respondent:
Warden Gary Williams and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buchanon v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Terry James Buchanon, II
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles, Lynn Head, Sarah C. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lathers v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv00207
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Lathers
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Gary Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Peterson
as 2:2020cv01816
Petitioner:
Gary Lavon Davis
Respondent:
Kenneth Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Greer-El v. Brunson et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2020cv00167
Plaintiff:
Jerome Greer-El
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Andre Brunson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilbourn v. Toney et al
as 5:2019cv01836
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Wilbourn
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Debra Toney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Marshall et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2019cv00772
Defendant:
Gary Ray Maxwell, State of Alabama, Dewayne Estes and others
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
