Cases 1 - 10 of 240
John D. Puchner v. Eric Severson, et al
as 24-2040
Petitioner:
JOHN D. PUCHNER
Respondent:
ERIC J. SEVERSON, MIKE MAXWELL and J. P. STADTMUELLER
Puchner v. Maxwell et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2024cv00478
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Mike Maxwell, Lisa Neubauer, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Middleton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)
as 3:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
John D. Middleton
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pelko v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
John D Pelko
Respondent:
Sheriff J.C. Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
John D. Puchner v. Eric J. Severson
as 24-1045
Petitioner:
JOHN D. PUCHNER
Respondent:
ERIC J. SEVERSON
Luton v. State of Kansas
as 23-3263
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN D. LUTON
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
Puchner v. Severson et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv01523
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Eric Severson, Mike Maxwell, Hon Pepper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John Puchner v. Eric Severson
as 23-3153
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN D. PUCHNER
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIC J. SEVERSON
Luton (ID 36921) v. Kansas, State of
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2023cv03231
Petitioner:
John D. Luton
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.