Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent:
Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kyler v. Miller et al
as 8:2015cv01078
Petitioner:
William Kyler
Respondent:
Warden Richard E Miller and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTINEZ v. KYLER et al
as 2:2014cv00085
Petitioner:
FRAZIER MARTINEZ
Respondent:
KENNETH D. KYLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREGORY v. KYLER et al
as 2:2013cv07448
Petitioner:
LARRY E. GREGORY
Respondent:
KENNETH D. KYLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrone Holloway v. Kenneth Kyler, et al
as 13-1913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HOLLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH KYLER, SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Darryl Gray v. Kenneth Kyler, et al
as 10-4574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH KYLER, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Harry Beckett v. Kenneth Kyler, et al
as 09-1708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY L. BECKETT
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH KYLER and ATTY GEN PA
Defendant:
EDWARD M. MARSICO, JR.
Edgar Hurlburt, Jr. v. Kenneth Kyler, et al
as 08-4482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDGAR MARTIN HURLBURT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH KYLER, DA SNYDER CTY and ATTY GEN PA
Gabriel Pittman v. Kenneth Kyler, et al
as 08-1629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL I. PITTMAN
Defendant:
KENNETH KYLER, DA LEHIGH and ATTY GEN PA
JONES v. KYLER
as 2:2008cv00655
Petitioner:
JAMES H. JONES
Respondent:
KENNETH KYLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
