Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hicks v. Rutledge
as 4:2022cv01074
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Payne et al
as 6:2022cv06110
Petitioner:
Doyle Anthony Jones
Respondent:
Dexter Payne and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Gorman et al
as 4:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Joseph Gorman, Lafayette Woods, Jr and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stewart v. Payne et al
as 2:2022cv02064
Petitioner:
Phillip Dewayne Stewart
Respondent:
Dexter Payne and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrell v. Payne, et al
as 6:2022cv06034
Petitioner:
Christopher W. Terrell
Respondent:
Dexter Payne and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdulhakim Muhammad v. Dexter Payne
as 22-1126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdulhakim Muhammad
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (Originally named as Leslie Rutledge)
Jackson v. Massey et al
as 2:2022cv02014
Plaintiff:
Grayson Kash Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Jason Massey and Lisa Rutledge
Petitioner:
Benjamin Adam Winderweedle
Respondent:
Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCoy v. Gorman et al
as 4:2021cv00843
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Joseph Gorman, Cymber Tadlock and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Britt v. Payne
as 4:2021cv00648
Plaintiff:
J'Donta Del'Marco Britt
Defendant:
Leslie Rutledge and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ray v. Gentry
as 5:2021cv05008
Defendant:
Warden Gentry and Leslie Rutledge
Petitioner:
Eric Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
