Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey v. District of Columbia et al
as 2:2024cv05091
Petitioner:
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Respondent:
District of Columbia, U.S. Attorney General and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michael Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 23-7155
Petitioner / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY, Monacan Nation Director of Project Authority
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP Thompson
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6879
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCI Beckley
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6434
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, F.C.I. Beckley, W.Va., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6390
Petitioner / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCI Beckley
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6305
Petitioner / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCI Beckley
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6169
Petitioner / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCI Beckley
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6170
Petitioner / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCI Beckley
Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 3:2020cv01150
Petitioner:
Chief Michael S Owlfeather-Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6608
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
