Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Watson v. Jennings
as 4:2019cv03398
Respondent:
Rich Jennings, Michelle L. Burriel, Sheila D. Whirley and others
Petitioner:
Rafael Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crawford v. Baltazar et al
as 1:2015cv05038
Petitioner:
Carl Crawford
Respondent:
Baltazar, Andrew J. Schell, Kevin F. McShane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Douglas McShane v. Matthew Cate
as 14-56254
Petitioner - Appellant:
DOUGLAS BRIAN MCSHANE
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Juliette McShane v. Nancy Howton
as 13-35116
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIETTE MARIE MCSHANE
Respondent - Appellee:
NANCY HOWTON, CCCF Superintendent
Douglas McShane v. Matthew Cate
as 12-55575
Petitioner - Appellee:
DOUGLAS BRIAN MCSHANE
Respondent - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cahill v. St. Louis County Circuit Court et al
as 4:2011cv00938
Petitioner:
Kevin Cahill
Respondent:
St. Louis County Circuit Court, Unknown McShane, Keith Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davidson v. McShane et al
as 3:2010cv00725
Petitioner:
Lennie Ty Davidson
Respondent:
Michael McShane and Multnomah County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Juliette McShane v. Nancy Howton
as 10-35466
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIETTE MARIE MCSHANE
Respondent - Appellee:
NANCY HOWTON, CCCF Superintendent
Douglas Brian McShane v. Matthew Cate
as 5:2009cv01243
Petitioner:
Douglas Brian McShane
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
McShane v. Howton
as 3:2008cv01443
Petitioner:
Juliette Marie McShane
Respondent:
Nancy Howton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
