Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Henderson v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
Javaris R. Henderson
Respondent:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nicole Henderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-10431
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICOLE R. HENDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
HENDERSON v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ET AL
as 3:2019cv00422
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
NICOLE R HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00017
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Nicole R Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brock v. Oklahoma County Detention Center et al
as 5:2018cv00381
Petitioner:
Aaron Thomas Brock
Respondent:
Oklahoma County Detention Center, PD Taylor, David L Prater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HENDERSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2015cv01049
Petitioner:
LARRY R. HENDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv02074
Petitioner:
Little R. Henderson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv03108
Petitioner:
Little R. Henderson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dwaine R Henderson v. J McDonald
as 2:2012cv08059
Petitioner:
Dwaine R Henderson
Respondent:
J McDonald
James Farbs v. Associate Warden C Ynson et al
as 2:2012cv00777
Respondent:
CO Chavez, CO C Curry, CO Galvan and others
Petitioner:
James Farbs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
