Cases 1 - 10 of 31
JERRY-EL v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 2:2022cv01484
Petitioner:
BERNARD JERRY-EL
Respondent:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JABBAR-EL v. CRISWELL WIEGAND et al
as 2:2021cv01734
Petitioner:
KAREEM JABBAR-EL
Respondent:
CHRISTY CRISWELL WIEGAND, WARDEN OF NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GARCIA v. PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 1:2020cv01431
Petitioner:
El-Jahson Garcia
Respondent:
Pa Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00957
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHAKIR v. CAPOZZA
as 2:2019cv01652
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA
Petitioner:
YA-SIN EL-AMIN SHAKIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILTON-EL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2018cv03226
Petitioner:
CLEATUS MILTON-EL
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunter-El v. Ebbert
as 3:2018cv00894
Petitioner:
Aaron Hunter-El
Respondent:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JERRY-EL v. LUTHER
as 2:2016mc00404
Petitioner:
BERNARD CARTER JERRY-EL
Respondent:
JAMEY LUTHER and BEAVER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HINES EL v. MOONEY et al
as 5:2015cv04103
Petitioner:
CRAIG HINES EL
Respondent:
MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EVANS-EL v. MEANS et al
as 2:2015cv00537
Petitioner:
ALTER EVANS-EL
Respondent:
RAYFORD ALLEN MEANS, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
