General Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 120
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00778
Petitioner: LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent: BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00913
Petitioner: LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent: BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00028
Petitioner: LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent: BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01797
Petitioner: KEYION M. LEWIS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOBBY LUMPKIN, JR., MICHAEL BRITT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PIERRE v. WOODS
as 1:2021cv03295
Petitioner: MANES PIERRE
Respondent: WILLIAM WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLLIER v. BURNES et al
as 1:2020cv02701
Defendant: DANIEL T. FLOYD, BALDEN D. POLK, DANNY OLIPHANT and others
Plaintiff: DARRON LASHAWN COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BLACKMON v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2020cv02446
Respondent: WILLIAMS
Petitioner: JAMES BLACKMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOYD v. BARR
as 1:2020cv02002
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR
Petitioner: DANIEL P. BOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LOPEZ-PENA v. BARR We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01889
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR LOPEZ-PENA
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
PRUITT-BOYETTE v. BARR
as 1:2020cv01492
Petitioner: KEYON PRUITT-BOYETTE
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?