Cases 1 - 10 of 36
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD NAJI, PATRICK NAGLE, WELLPATH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, WELLPATH MEDICAL CO., DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Carl Richard
Defendant:
Superintendent Barry Smith, Wellpath Medical Co., Dr. Muhammad Naji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KITTRELL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
ANDRE KITTRELL
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, LIEUTENANT OLIVER, JEFF MEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. THORNLEY et al
as 3:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
KEITH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
CASEY THORNLEY, PATRICK NAGLE, DEANNA DELLATORRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Twitty v. Margett Barns, et al
as 22-2801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY TWITTY
Defendant / Appellee:
MARGETT BARNS, C.R.N.P., CASEY N. THORNLEY, C.R.N.P., DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Chad Sasse v. John Wetzel, et al
as 21-3033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAD ALLEN SASSE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BARRY R. SMITH, DORETTA CHENCHARICK and others
COSGROVE v. WELLPATH et al
as 3:2021cv00124
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES COSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
COSGROVE v. WELLPATH et al
as 3:2021cv00092
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and MUHAMMAD NAJI
Plaintiff:
JAMES COSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. NAJI et al
as 3:2020cv00222
Defendant:
DR. JAY COWAN and DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI
Plaintiff:
SAVOY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
