Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Adam Ward v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-70016
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADAM KELLY WARD
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Beunka Adams v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-70010
Petitioner - Appellee:
BEUNKA ADAMS
Respondent - Appellant:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Beunka Adams v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-70011
Petitioner - Appellant:
BEUNKA ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Adams v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2012cv00036
Petitioner:
Beunka Adams
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Larry Adams v. Renee Baker, et al
as 12-15308
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY EDWARD ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO
OH Execution Protocol
as 12-3035
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS, et. al.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES L. LORRAINE
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Norcross v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00009
Petitioner:
Adam Norcross
Respondent:
Carl C. Danberg and Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. Thaler
as 3:2010cv02101
Petitioner:
Adam Kelly Ward
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stanley Adams v. Margaret Bradshaw
as 10-4281
Petitioner - Appellee:
STANLEY T. ADAMS
Respondent - Appellant:
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Beunka Adams v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-70023
Petitioner - Appellant:
BEUNKA ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
