Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Baze v. Parker
as 0:2010cv00033
Petitioner:
Ralph Stephens Baze, Jr.
Respondent:
Phillip Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reynolds v. Kasich et al
as 2:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Reynolds
Defendant:
Ted Strickland, Terry J. Collins, Phillip Kerns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Goforth v. Parker
as 5:2009cv00352
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Goforth and Jonathan Wayne Goforth
Respondent:
Phillip W. Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dempster v. Holder et al
as 6:2009cv06441
Petitioner:
Ruel Dempster
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Michael T. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cooey v. Kasich et al
as 2:2004cv01156
Defendant:
Robert Taft, Robert Taft, Reginald Wilkinson and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jerome Henderson, Jeffrey Don Lundgren, Kenneth Biros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hartman v. Kasich et al
as 2:2009cv00242
Plaintiff:
Brett Hartman
Defendant:
Ted Strickland, Terry J. Collins, Phillip Kerns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. McNeil
as 1:2008cv23420
Plaintiff:
Harry Franklin Phillips and Harry Franklin Phillips
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Phillips v. McNeil
as 1:2008cv23450
Plaintiff:
Harry Franklin Phillips and Harry Franklin Phillips
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Workman
as 08-7043
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST EUGENE PHILLIPS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Hancock v. Sirmons
as 5:2008cv00327
Petitioner:
Phillip Hancock
Respondent:
Marty Sirmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
