Cases 1 - 10 of 69
FLOR v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv02765
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANTHONY FLOR
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. MARTIN and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frein v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00344
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Robert Gilmore and Mark Garman
Petitioner:
Eric Matthew Frein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2020cv01371
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
LEETON JAHWANZA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
LE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv05869
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, ROBERT GILMORE, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Petitioner:
TAM M. LE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
Jacoby v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02000
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, PA State Attorney General, Robert Gilmore and others
Petitioner:
Timothy Matthew Jacoby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01553
Petitioner:
MARCEL JOHNSON
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, MARK GARMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2017cv01969
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Hicks
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Robert Gilmore, Mark Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YANDAMURI v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv03798
Petitioner:
RAGHUNANDAN YANDAMURI
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HANEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01901
Petitioner:
PATRICK RAY HANEY
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodard v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv02262
Petitioner:
Aric S. Woodard
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Robert Gilmore, Mark Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
