Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WHITFIELD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv03484
Plaintiff:
AMER WILLIAM WHITFIELD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P.P.S SYSTEM PRISON'S, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01155
Petitioner:
WILLIAM RIVERA
Respondent:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT STEVEN GLUNT and .SUPERINTENDENT TAMMY FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
PELZER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01932
Petitioner:
KEVIN PELZER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT D. GILMORE, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv06247
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2011cv04681
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MARIROSA LAMAS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR LEHIGH COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PADDY v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2011cv02453
Petitioner:
DONYELL PADDY
Respondent:
LOUS FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF: SETH WILLIAM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: UNKNOWN TO ME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Housman v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2011cv00167
Petitioner:
William Housman
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Louis Folino, Mariroso Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WRIGHT v. BEARD et al
as 3:2007cv00251
Petitioner:
WILLIAM L. WRIGHT, III
Respondent:
JEFFERY A. BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO and FRANK TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
Abdul-Salaam v. Beard, et al
as 4:2002cv02124
Petitioner:
Abdul-Salaam
Respondent:
Jeffrey Beard , William S. Stickman, III. , Joseph P. Mazurkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOND v. BEARD et al
as 2:2002cv08592
Petitioner:
JESSE BOND
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD , WILLIAM STRICKMAN , JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
