Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Champ v. Green
as 2:2016cv01702
Plaintiff:
Larry D Champ
Defendant:
Ray Charles Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTER v. GREEN
as 2:2016cv05936
Petitioner:
TROY PORTER
Respondent:
CHARLES GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2016cv01991
Plaintiff:
MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CHARLES GREEN and ALFARO ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHADOT v. GREENE et al
as 2:2016cv01857
Plaintiff:
HASSAN A. SHADOT
Defendant:
CHARLES GREENE and ALFARO ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. GREENE et al
as 2:2016cv00901
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL FLORES
Defendant:
CHARLES GREENE, ALFARO ORTIZ, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. GREENE et al
as 2:2016cv00902
Plaintiff:
OSCAR G. ROBINSON
Defendant:
CHARLES GREENE, MR. ALFARO ORTIZ, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. South Carolina, State of
as 3:2015cv04673
Plaintiff:
Charles Green
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. GREEN et al
as 2:2015cv07407
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LONG
Defendant:
CHARLES GREEN , LIONEL ANICETTE, ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CHARLES GREEN
Thirdparty_defendant:
CFG Health Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSTIS et al v. GREEN et al
as 2:2015cv05572
Plaintiff:
SHAWN CUSTIS and MONITA JOHNSON
Defendant:
CHARLES GREEN, KATHY COLEY and JANE AND JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUSTIS et al v. GREEN et al
as 2:2015cv04435
Plaintiff:
SHAWN CUSTIS and MONITA JOHNSON
Defendant:
CHARLES GREEN, KATHY COLEY and JANE & JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
