Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Shannon v. McLeod et al
as 3:2013cv00921
Plaintiff:
Byron Shannon
Defendant:
Don McLeod, Jamie Johnson, Beth Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engles v. Jones et al
as 6:2013cv06461
Plaintiff:
Jessie Engles
Defendant:
Jerry Jones, Richard Hardy, Jeffrey Cavalussi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engles v. Jones et al
as 9:2013cv00990
Plaintiff:
Jessie Engles
Defendant:
Jerry Jones, Richard Hardy, Jeffrey Cavalussi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abreu v. Countryman
as 12-2723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Michael Rasmus, Hearing Officer, David Stein, Teacher, Jerry Jones, Sergeant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Barry Countryman, Correction Officer, Annette Holm, Nurse, Albert Prack, Special Housing Unit/Disciplinary Program and others
Abreu v. Countryman et al
as 6:2012cv06032
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Barry Countryman, Annette Holm, Michael Rasmus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Bartley et al
as 3:2010cv01011
Plaintiff:
King George Murray, III
Defendant:
Don Bartley, City of Monroe, Jerry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Noel et al
as 3:2010cv00624
Plaintiff:
Donald Scott
Defendant:
Robert Noel, Jerry Jones and Indigent Defendant Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berkley v. Noel et al
as 3:2010cv00495
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Berkley
Defendant:
Robert Noel, Royce Tony, Jerry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gold v. Noel et al
as 3:2010cv00496
Plaintiff:
Antonie Gold
Defendant:
Robert Noel, Royce Tony, Jerry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardwell v. Noel et al
as 3:2010cv00489
Plaintiff:
Booker T Hardwell
Defendant:
Robert Noel, Royce Tony, Jerry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
