Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Brown v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Gina Whitlock, Unknown Pewhitt, Nichole Green and others
Plaintiff:
Vennis P. Brown, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Randolph County et al
as 2:2018cv00054
Defendant:
Moberly Regional Medical Center, Randolph County, Michaela Huber and others
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benford v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
Terry Lewis Benford
Defendant:
Dunklin County, Nichole Green, Ashley Grisham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kulhanek v. Griffith et al
as 4:2017cv02431
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kulhanek
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, Greg Dunn, Ian Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv00728
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Walker
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Chris Koster, Youngs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv00649
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Walker
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Chris Koster, Jackson County Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv00651
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Walker
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Chris Koster, Jackson County Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv00646
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Walker
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Chris Koster, Jackson County Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinson v. Dunklin County Justice Center
as 1:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Doug Stinson
Defendant:
Dunklin County Justice Center, Bob Holder, Wally Pointer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabelman v. Randolph County Justice Center et al
as 2:2014cv00077
Plaintiff:
Cory Gregory Gabelman
Defendant:
Randolph County Justice Center, Randy Smith, Nancy Courtny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
