Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Clifton v. Schofield et al
as 3:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton, Charles Montague, Derrick Payne and others
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mooring v. Lewis et al
as 5:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Craig Mooring
Defendant:
Brady Lewis, Tony Williams, NFN Lofton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2014cv02530
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark Luttrell, Jr., James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arzuaga v. Faucher
as 13-4589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose Arzuaga
Defendant - Appellee:
Steven Faucher, Individual Capacity, Edward Maldonado, Individual and Official Capacity, Don Cyr, Individual Capacity and others
Dorlette v. Cahill et al
as 3:2013cv01145
Plaintiff:
Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant:
Jason Cahill, Michael Lajoie, Leo C. Arnone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Foster et al
as 3:2012cv00660
Defendant:
Rene Baker, S. L. Foster and Mike Oxborrow
Plaintiff:
Tony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Foster et al
as 3:2012cv00596
Defendant:
Rene Baker, Guardian for J. Doe John Doe, S.L. Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goode v. Quiros et al
as 3:2012cv01205
Plaintiff:
Jason Goode
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Stephen Faucher, Lauren Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arzuaga v. Faucher et al
as 3:2012cv00668
Plaintiff:
Jose Arzuaga
Defendant:
Steven Faucher, Edward Maldonado, Don Cyr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorlette v. Dyson et al
as 3:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant:
Dyson, Cotto, Tony Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
