Cases 11 - 20 of 133
ARRICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Keith Arrick, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Sidney Brown
Defendant:
Health Services Administrator and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
K. J. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00074
Defendant:
Officer Larry Martin, Federal Correctional Complex Hazelton and United States of America
Plaintiff:
K. J.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
McFarland v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00201
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Philander McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Mays v. Hudgins et al
as 3:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Richard Hudgins, Brent Miller, R. Clem and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Randolph Mays
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clinton v. Grant et al
as 3:2020cv00178
Plaintiff:
Gregory Keith Clinton
Defendant:
The United States Of America and Elizabeth D. Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
El-Alamin v. United States of America - Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons - Unit Manager Jones, B. Friend, Unknown Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Malik Al Mustafa El-Alamin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shipman v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00031
Petitioner:
Joseph Wayne Shipman
Defendant:
United States of America
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pancake
as 2:2020cv00030
Respondent:
United states of america and Warden, FCI Tallahassee
Petitioner:
Geniece Pancake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crocker v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00089
Petitioner:
Marcus Crocker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
