Cases 21 - 30 of 159
BANKS v. LANCE, ET AL
as 1:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
RICKY BANKS
Defendant:
DR. EDWARD LANCE and SGT. H. ARMENTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COWAN v. SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
LYNN COWAN
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., KAREN MICHELLE RUSSELL, PA-C, SUSAN A FORTNER, LPN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter v. Municipality of Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2021cv00628
Plaintiff:
Ondre T Hunter
Defendant:
Municipality of Mecklenburg County, Timothy Gromis, John Vanshemel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Lance et al
as 5:2021ct03342
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Edward Lance and Sgt. H. Armenta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. BOGER et al
as 1:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
GERMINIQUE S. ROSS
Defendant:
J. C. BOGER, J. H. PRISK, Z. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gause v. Driggers et al
as 3:2021cv00553
Plaintiff:
Walter Timothy Gause
Defendant:
Curtis Driggers, Denzil H. Forreta, Kimberly P. Hoppin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2021cv00782
Plaintiff:
WAYNE H. BUTLER
Defendant:
SHERIFF BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, CHIEF DEPUTY ROCKY JOYNER, DIRECTOR ROBERT E. SLATER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSKEY v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00773
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL H. FOSKEY
Defendant:
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, JANET YELLEN, CHARLES P. RETTIG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. Laybourn et al
as 5:2021ct03295
Plaintiff:
Trevor Eugene Reed
Defendant:
Dr. Katherine Laybourn, Dr. Mark Dicocco, Ms. Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Means v. Higdon et al
as 5:2021ct03267
Plaintiff:
Charles Antonio Means
Defendant:
Bobby Higdon, Josh Stein, Stanley L. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
