Cases 21 - 30 of 198
Rolon v. Migliori et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Defendant:
John & Jane Does A-Z, Kevin G. Shea, Grant W. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio V Rolon and Antonio V. Rolon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10616
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10944
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care of Michigan, P.C. and Corizon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10615
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roby v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2018cv00544
Defendant:
Al Ramirez, Richards, Randy Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Roby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00804
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Corizon, LLC, Centurion Correctional Healthcare of New Mexico, LLC ("Centurion"), A Joint Venture Between Centene Corporation and MHM Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ronnie v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv03259
Plaintiff:
Markus Levonte Ronnie
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Sam Peifer, Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Steele et al
as 4:2012cv01548
Plaintiff:
Lamont Williamson
Defendant:
Troy Steele, Unknown Null, Unknown Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00984
Plaintiff:
Edwin Jones
Defendant:
Corizon Inc., Missouri Department of Corrections, Troy Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Grahn et al
as 2:2018cv10903
Plaintiff:
Broderick Hodge
Defendant:
Corey Grahn, Randel, Surbine Aiken and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
