Cases 21 - 30 of 237
Barber v. Hill et al
as 1:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Nina Hill
Plaintiff:
Joseph Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNearney v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 1:2019cv00481
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, HSA Johnson, Rona Siegert and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McNearney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feagins v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 1:2019cv00472
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Idaho Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Tom Feagins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Getnet et al
as 8:2019cv03440
Defendant:
Corizone Medical Services, Luka Getnet, Warden of Central Booking Intake Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hardman v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 1:2019cv00209
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Nina Hill
Plaintiff:
Gary Hardman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nigro v. Christensen et al
as 1:2019cv00441
Defendant:
Brian Klingensmith, Timmothy McKay, Jack Fraser and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Vincent Nigro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv06152
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Fulton Reception & Diagnostic Correctional Center, Missouri Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Kenny A Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruznic v. Corizon Medical Services, et al.
as 1:2019cv00383
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, IDOC Health Director, Rebekah Haggard and others
Plaintiff:
Ramo Ruznic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrow v. Norman et al
as 6:2019cv03264
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, South Central Correctional Center, Daniel J. Ritter and others
Plaintiff:
Kurtis James Farrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrow v. Norman et al
as 4:2019cv01716
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, South Central Correctional Center, Daniel J. Ritter and others
Plaintiff:
Kurtis James Farrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
