Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Robert Reeves v. W. Chapman, et al
as 13-2093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT REEVES
Defendant:
W. CHAPMAN, Assistant Deputy Warden, L. JACOBSEN, Hearing Officer and RNC ENDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. SALISBURY, Captain, INSPECTOR BELEN and B. EVERS, RNU
Debose v. Janda et al
as 3:2013cv01005
Plaintiff:
Louis Lovell Debose
Defendant:
G. J. Janda, J. Kellerman, R. Dela Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggin v. Rollins et al
as 3:2013cv05057
Plaintiff:
James O'Neil Wiggin
Defendant:
William Rollins, R Bednaczyk, Richard Enders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Brown v. Devon Schrum, et al
as 12-35546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant:
DEVON SCHRUM
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD MORGAN, DEBRA HOTEP, MATT GAMBONE and others
Reeves v. Chapman et al
as 2:2011cv11830
Plaintiff:
Robert Reeves
Defendant:
W Chapman, K Salisbury, Belen and others
Burch et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2010cv00807
Defendant:
State of Washington, Steve Hammond, Ken Quinn and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Brown v. Devon Schrum, et al
as 09-35945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant:
DEVON SCHRUM
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD MORGAN, DEBRA HOTEP, MATT GAMBONE and others
Simeton v. Austin et al
as 9:2009cv81333
Plaintiff:
Nakia A. Simeton
Defendant:
R. Austin, E. Boe, R. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown v. Schrum et al
as 3:2008cv05326
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
Devon Schrum, Richard Morgan, Kenneth Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Derose et al
as 1:2008cv00744
Plaintiff:
Johnny Collins
Defendant:
Dominck L. Derose, Leonard K. Carrall, Mayor of guards unknown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
