Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Lancaster v. Hill et al
as 5:2017cv00567
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Defendant:
FNU Hill, John/Jane Doe, J. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carawan v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2016cv00578
Plaintiff:
William Carawan, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Mitchell, Unidentified Unit Manager, FNU Horne and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirtman v. Grismer et al
as 5:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
Derrick Eugene Kirtman
Defendant:
Margaret Grismer, Todd Lawrence, Katherine Demer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gurrola v. Russell et al
as 1:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Gurrola
Defendant:
FNU Russell, FNU Bean, FNU Baltimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carawan v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
William Carawan, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Mitchell, FNU Miller, FNU McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Dental Department et al
as 9:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Dental Department, Administrative Segregation Security, Stephen D Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Dental Department et al
as 6:2015cv00511
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Dental Department, Administrative Segregation Security, Stephen D Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Lutes et al
as 3:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Marion Beasley, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Lutes, FNU Lilly and FNU Lee
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lozano v. Weaver et al
as 1:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Leonardo M Lozano
Defendant:
Virgil D Weaver, Elzis Duncan, Scott W Billeaud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughlin v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Demetrius McLaughlin
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prison, FCC Coleman - USP I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
