Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Anson Chi v. John Doe
as 16-10584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANSON CHI
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN #1 DOE, et al
Richard Jennings v. Monty Hudspeth, et al
as 16-40665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD W. JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTY HUDSPETH, Unit Warden, JOHN #2 DOE, Shift Sergeant, JANE DOE, I, Female Texas Department of Criminal Justice Officer and others
King v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2016cv04016
Plaintiff:
Domintric King
Defendant:
Anita Alvarez, Robert Kowalski, John #1 Doe and others
Movant:
Anthony Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wynn-Turner v. Doll et al
as 3:2016cv00511
Plaintiff:
Evans A Wynn-Turner
Defendant:
Clair Doll, Brittney O'Brien, Jeff Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spangler Provance v. Holbrook et al
as 4:2015cv05115
Plaintiff:
Bryce Leroy Spangler Provance
Defendant:
Donald Holbrook, Charles Pease, Sundberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Baldwin v. David Abston, et al
as 14-60576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ABSTON, Pickens County Alabama Sheriff, KEITH COX, Pickens County Sheriff Det., JOHN MCBRIDE, Pickens County Sheriff Det. and others
Burton v. Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv00133
Plaintiff:
Lonnie L Burton
Defendant:
Johnson, John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sepulveda et al v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2014cv00789
Plaintiff:
George Sepulveda, Eddie Wright, Matthew A. Turner and others
Defendant:
David Ebbert, A.W. Oddo, A.W. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kevin Johnson v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 14-20184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), REGINA GRIMES, Administrator, Interstate Corrections Compact, STUART JENKINS, Administrator, Interstate Corrections Compact and others
Anson Chi v. John Doe #1
as 14-10261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANSON CHI
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN #1 DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
