Cases 31 - 40 of 177
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Wilson et al
as 3:2020cv02479
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas, Dr. Assa and Dr. Faltas
Defendant:
John H. Strom, Dinah Gail Steele, Hugh Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Trump et al
as 6:2020cv01360
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Beth Drake, Donald J Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 6:2020cv01309
Defendant:
B Stirling, A M Wilson, Beth Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Marion County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2020cv01222
Defendant:
John Q Atkinson, Jr, Tracey Causey, Marion County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold Parson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dizzley v. Hixson et al
as 2:2020cv00991
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Appeals, Judge William H Seals, Ronald Hazzard and others
Plaintiff:
Terron Gerhard Dizzley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Lee et al
as 6:2020cv00245
Defendant:
A R Lee, P B Wickensimer, R L Blume and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Wright et al
as 6:2019cv02856
Defendant:
Allen Freeman and Chuck Wright
Plaintiff:
Doron H Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Hood et al
as 6:2019cv01702
Defendant:
Judge Harwell, B Stirling, J W McBride and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speaks v. Dulude et al
as 6:2019cv01694
Plaintiff:
Mr Hakiim Rashid Speaks
Defendant:
Mr Mark H Dulude and Greenville County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koon v. On Point Investigations et al
as 7:2019cv01463
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland Koon, Robert H Koon and Robert Koon
Defendant:
Bill Blanton, Gaffney City Police, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
