Cases 31 - 40 of 943
Rubio v. Raburn et al
as 1:2018cv01201
Defendant:
Tina Raburn, Angela Jones, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Rubio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 1:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Corey D. Gilbert
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, f/n/u Tanner and Dentist f/n/u Brewster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Manzo v. Rojas et al
as 1:2018cv01121
Defendant:
Robert Mbuya, F. Rojas, Keith Ivens and others
Plaintiff:
Juan J. Manzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurelio v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv01974
Defendant:
Myra Walter, Michael Miller, Rick Raemisch and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Aurelio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Liaux et al
as 1:2018cv00289
Defendant:
Kimoto, State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety, A. Asato and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party:
Shelley Nobriga, Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2018cv00167
Defendant:
Lieutenant Bowie, Grant, Warden Frink and others
Plaintiff:
Randy K. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Victor Tagle v. CCA
as 18-16373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL TAGLE, Victor Tagle, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Victor Tagle v. CCA
as 18-16311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL TAGLE, AKA Victor Tagle
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Grandinetti v. Espinda et al
as 1:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Nolan P. Espinda, Department of Public Safety, Deputy Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalty v. United States et al
as 1:2018cv01339
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
United States, United States Army, Judicial Branch of US Gov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
