Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Nowlin v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2018ct03078
Plaintiff:
Hassie Demond Nowlin
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Guilford County, B.J. Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dancy v. Davis et al
as 5:2016ct03014
Plaintiff:
Emmanuelle K. Dancy
Defendant:
Lindsey R. Davis, Jr. and Guilford County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Carpenter et al
as 5:2015ct03089
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Alec Carpenter, Mary J. Cook, Frank L. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY COURTHOUSE
as 1:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JUNIOR NELSON
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY COURTHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Guilford County Courthouse
as 5:2014ct03304
Plaintiff:
Samuel Junior Nelson
Defendant:
Guilford County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Russell v. Guilford County Municipality
as 14-7662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT KITHER RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
GUILFORD COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, HIGH POINT COURT HOUSE, HENRY E. FRYE and others
RUSSELL v. GUILFORD COUNTY MUNICIPALITY et al
as 1:2014cv00831
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KITHER RUSSELL
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, HIGH POINT COURT HOUSE, HENRY FRYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL v. GUILFORD COUNTY MUNICIPALITY
as 1:2014cv00736
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KITHER RUSSELL
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY MUNICIPALITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RCOM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00243
Plaintiff:
HOANH RCOM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCORMICK V. SIPE ET AL
as 1:2011cv00416
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW E. MCCORMICK
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. SIPE, PATROLMAN STRICKLAND, CARTER CLENDENIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
