Cases 31 - 40 of 102
(PC) Magee v. Arkowitz et al
as 2:2019cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee and Ruchell Cinque Magee- PREFILING ORDER
Defendant:
Steven Arkowitz, Timothy A. Reardon and J. Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bosse v. Carlin et al
as 1:2018cv00539
Defendant:
GEO Corp. Inc., Kim Madsen, Michael Reardon and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Earl Bosse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarthy v. City of Spokane et al
as 4:2018cv05147
Defendant:
Blaine Kakuda, Thomas Lee, Stephen Garvin and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew S McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neece v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2018cv01941
Defendant:
Jefferson County, M. Albers, Reardon and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Magee v. Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2018cv04518
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
Timothy A. Reardon and Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dorn et al
as 1:2018cv01751
Plaintiff:
Devin B. Jackson
Defendant:
Bueller, Turner, Monica Albers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee v. Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2018cv01562
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Timothy A. Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudspath v Reardon, et al
as 2:2018cv02133
Plaintiff:
Zechariah M Hudspath
Defendant:
Daniel Reardon, . Mattingly, Jason Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee v. Rogers et al
as 3:2018cv02873
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
Yvonne G. Rogers and Timothy A. Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee v. Koh et al
as 5:2018cv02363
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
Lucy H. Koh and Timothy Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
