Civil Rights Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 41 - 50 of 202
TYLER v. JOINER et al
as 1:2020cv00806
Defendant: DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, RONALD J. SHORT, ANTON T. MCALLISTER and others
Plaintiff: XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Johnson et al
as 5:2020ct03252
Defendant: Sgt. Charles K. Barbour, Lt. Angie Hinson, Sgt. Dwight Johnson and others
Plaintiff: Victor Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PIERCE v. SPAIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00711
Defendant: STEPHANIE STEMPLE, M.D., LINDSEY SPAIN, SANTANA DEBERRY and others
Plaintiff: CORIANTE L. PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. GOLDSBROUGH et al
as 1:2020cv00605
Defendant: PAUL A. SHANNER, SUSAN SPONATE, RONALD J. SHORT and others
Plaintiff: XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00125
Plaintiff: Devon Armond Gayles and Devon A. Gayles El
Defendant: Tracy Boone, Paul L. Maloney, Mary Malesky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruhbayan v. Smith et al
as 5:2020ct03115
Defendant: Robert B. King, David Leu, Allyson K. Duncan and others
Plaintiff: Rajul Ruhbayan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOYCE v. PUGH OIL CO. INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00189
Defendant: RICHARD K. PUGH, BETTY PUGH, ALAN VERGIL PUGH and others
Plaintiff: EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. VADEN
as 1:2020cv00038
Defendant: K. D. VADEN
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. BRANNON et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant: OFFICER K. B. STEWART, MAGISTRATE H. D. BRANNON, RANDOLPH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff: QUANTEZ THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bynum v. County of Northampton et al
as 5:2019ct03322
Defendant: Sergeant Tim K. Spence and County of Northampton
Plaintiff: Olander R. Bynum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?