Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Larson et al v. Lake et al
as 0:2017cv03551
Plaintiff:
Guy I. Greene
Defendant:
Kelly Lake, Carlton County Jail, Paul Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Kintu et al
as 0:2017cv02263
Plaintiff:
Honora Tremaine Patterson
Defendant:
Emmanual Kintu, Nick Dechene, Dan Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tepoel v. Conley et al
as 0:2017cv00939
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Tepoel
Defendant:
William M. Conley, Jane Doe Conley, Barbara B. Crabb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Bzoskie et al
as 0:2016cv03805
Plaintiff:
DeSean Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
James Bzoskie , Verby , Heart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graphenteen v. Jesson et al
as 0:2015cv02503
Plaintiff:
John Graphenteen
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Anne Barry, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Housman et al v. Jesson et al
as 0:2015cv02209
Plaintiff:
Steven Allan Housman and Russell Lynn Norton
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy A. Johnston, Terrance K. Kneisel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services ("MDHS") et al
as 0:2015cv01573
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services ("MDHS"), Minnesota Sex Offender Program ("MSOP"), Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kulkay v. Roy et al
as 0:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Steven Kulkay
Defendant:
Tom Roy, Minnesota Department of Corrections, The, Minnesota, The State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2014cv04193
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Ninneman et al
as 0:2014cv03458
Plaintiff:
Guy Israel Greene
Defendant:
Brian Ninneman, Jason Johnson, Tom Maciej and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
