Cases 41 - 50 of 552
BROWN v. DOE
as 1:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. ANDOH et al
as 1:2022cv01104
Plaintiff:
JOVANTA C. WOODS
Defendant:
JOHN ANDOH, SYLVESTER VANN THOMPKINS and LINKS BUS TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORR. INST., RITHIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaKemper v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Cobey LaKemper
Defendant:
FNU Honeycutt, FNU Young, Russell Chester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Barnes et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Tony Timothy Martin
Defendant:
J.T. Barnes, John Does and Chris Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowery v. Shook et al
as 5:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
John N Lowery
Defendant:
FNU Shook, FNU Snuffer, FNU Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowland v. Pierce et al
as 5:2022ct03421
Plaintiff:
David L. Rowland, Jr.
Defendant:
Bonnie Pierce, Nationwide Insurance, Wake County Public Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. HUNT et al
as 1:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
SERGEANT GARY HUNT, SERGEANT REESE and MR. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Kelly v. Brown et al
as 5:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Victor L. O'Kelly
Defendant:
C. Brown, John Doe, I, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POLK v. STANLY COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CHRISHON POLK
Defendant:
STANLY COUNTY, STANLY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, J. CRISCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
