Cases 41 - 50 of 429
Plater v. Bowers et al
as 5:2022cv00789
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
David Bowers, GEO Group Inc A for Profit Corporation, Individually doing business as GEO Corrections and GEO Group Inc A for Profit Corporation in its Official Capacity doing business as GEO Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plater v. Poirot et al
as 5:2022cv00779
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
Eden Poirot and GEO Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plater v. Topping et al
as 5:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
Cristine Topping, Dr. FNU Weaks, FNU Rowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hemphill v. GEO Group Inc. (GEO) et al
as 5:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Hemphill
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc. (GEO) and Facility Administrator (Barry)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McArthur v. GEO Group Inc
as 5:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
John McArthur
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peguero v. Warden Cole et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Natanael Peguero
Defendant:
Warden Cole, GEO Group Inc., Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moquera-Rodriguez v. The Geo Group Inc
as 5:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Perci Wilam Moquera-Rodriguez
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos v. The Geo Group Inc
as 5:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
Adrian Montoya Carlos
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. The Geo Group Inc
as 5:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Jaime Torres
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez-Pena v. The Geo Group Inc
as 5:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Enrique Nunez-Pena
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
